Boston University Professor of History and International Relations Andrew Bacevich’s latest book about re-setting the course of U.S. foreign policy is a beacon of light to those who have eyes to see and an open mind to reason. To find out why, read on…
Continue reading “Andrew Bacevich, Washington Rules. An appreciation”
Princeton University Professor G. John Ikenberry is not a household name and his books on the theory of International Relations are written for scholars, not the general public. Yet he is arguably one of the most important and, possibly influential, thinkers of the post-Cold War period
In this essay I argue that we are entering the fin de jeu phase of the Belgian state’s agony. To see why the impending divorce of the Flemish and Walloon communities may be violent and highly damaging to the European experiment, read on… Mis au jour le 27 juillet 2010.
Continue reading “Summer Musings: The Violent End of the Kingdom of Belgium”
Est-ce que la diplomatie de M. Obama représente vraiment une rupture avec la politique hégémonique et unilatéraliste de George W. Bush ? Regardons les données des deux ambassadeurs américains actuellement installés à Bruxelles pour mieux répondre à cette question.
Continue reading “La continuité ou la rupture? Who Represents the Obama Administration in Belgium?”
Hoffmann is a towering intellect who has substantially shaped American political discourse even if his name and works are not widely known or popular in the general public. Part Two on his post-Cold War writings follows below…
Hoffmann is a towering intellect who has substantially shaped American political discourse even if his name and works are not widely known or popular in the general public. For an examination of his post-Cold War writings, read on…
Appearing as a solitary voice dealing with ‘Russia in NATO’ in the latest issue of Foreign Affairs magazine, Professor Kupchan’s article suffers from all the usual disadvantages of shadow boxing. Institutional reform of NATO deserves more round table discussions and public hearings if the decisions awaited this coming November are to be informed by rigorous expert argumentation and to avoid flaccid and self-congratulatory thinking within the box such as we have seen till now. To find out more, read on…
By any standard, Chomsky’s many works exposing the lies and deception of American imperial myths are inescapable reading for serious students of U.S. foreign policy in the post-Cold War period. In this essay we shall consider why his writings do not come in for scrutiny from academic scholars even as they attract a vast readership in the general public.
Continue reading “Noam Chomsky: The Most Widely Read Dissident Voice on U.S. Foreign Policy”
A vote in the U.S. House of Representatives on Dennis Kucinich’s ‘Privileged Resolution’ calling for a pull-out from Afghanistan gives realists an opportunity to find their voice. Is anyone interested?
Continue reading “Congressman Dennis Kucinich and the Power of One”
This is the third of a three-part essay examining Henry Kissinger’s writings on how to manage American foreign policy in the post-Cold War period. Revised 5 March 2010
Gilbert Doctorow 