Update on the Crocus terror attack

Day by day, the Russian security officials are expanding upon their claims that Ukraine financed and directed the terror attack on the Crocus City Hall concert venue. Sunday evening’s edition of News of the Week hosted by Dmitry Kiselyov pointed to crypto currency payments and other financial channels which were used by the Ukrainians, as the latest results of interrogations and further arrests have revealed. A substantial success reward is said to have awaited the assailants upon arrival in Kiev.

Meanwhile various Western media outlets including Deutsche Welle tell us the Kremlin has demanded the hand-over of the head of Kiev’s Security Service (SSB), brigadier general Vasyl Malyuk on charges of directing terrorist attacks in Russia. To be sure, Malyuk himself has claimed responsibility for the 2022 bombing of the Kerch (Crimea) bridge. But we may now assume that the Russians have evidence to hold him to account for directing the Crocus City Hall atrocity.

There is speculation in social media that Kiev’s refusal to surrender its terror campaign leaders would allow Russia to declare Ukraine a terrorist state. This would open the possibility for ‘neutralizing’ top Ukrainian officials on justifiable grounds.

However, we need not speculate about what may come next. De facto, Russia’s current offensive against Ukraine has escalated to a new, vastly more threatening level. There are daily punishing aerial bombing and missile attacks on military command centers across Ukraine, on training centers, on concentrations of foreign mercenaries. And then there is a new dimension to the destruction of Ukraine’s electricity network.

In the winter of 2022-2023, all the Western media spoke of Russian attacks on the energy infrastructure, on how Russia was allegedly seeking to impose misery on the Ukrainian civilians by depriving them of heat and light in the midst of freezing cold. But back then the reality was that Russia only struck substations and other distribution points.  Such destruction was meant to knock out power for tactical advantage over the Ukrainian armed forces. It was obvious that the substations and other gear could be replaced in a matter of weeks or months.  By contrast what is now going on is Russian destruction of power generating stations. Replacing them will be a matter of years, not months.

Very much to the point, the mayor of Kharkiv yesterday remarked to the press that the city’s power supplies have been utterly destroyed.  This development corresponds very nicely to the calls that were  made on the Evening with Vladimir Solovyov talk show last week for Kharkiv’s inhabitants to be sent packing in their cars headed west ahead of the city being razed to the ground. The intent was to end once and for all the missiles and artillery shells that Kharkiv has been sending daily into the neighboring Belgorod region of Russia to kill civilians in the greatest numbers possible.  Kharkiv may not yet be razed, but it certainly is on the way to becoming uninhabitable.

In the face of this massive and undeniable destruction by the Russians both on and off the battlefield, the bravado of Zelensky and his clique is fading. Indeed, the Ukrainian president has finally said publicly that it may be time for peace negotiations.

Let us hope that Russia’s post Crocus viciousness may bring the Ukrainians to their senses and end this awful war.

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2024

Postscript: Moscow based journalist John Helmer has published a very detailed account of what he calls ‘the electric war’: https://johnhelmer.net/how-the-electric-war-is-redrawing-the-ukraine-map-in-black/

Translation below into German (Andreas Mylaeus)

Aktuelles zum Krokus-Terroranschlag

Von Tag zu Tag erweitern die russischen Sicherheitsbehörden ihre Angaben, dass die Ukraine den Terroranschlag auf das Konzerthaus Crocus City Hall finanziert und geleitet hat. In der Sonntagabendausgabe der von Dmitri Kisseljow moderierten “Nachrichten der Woche” wurde auf Kryptowährungszahlungen und andere Finanzkanäle hingewiesen, die von den Ukrainern genutzt wurden, wie die jüngsten Ergebnisse der Verhöre und weitere Verhaftungen gezeigt haben. Auf die Täter soll bei ihrer Ankunft in Kiew eine beträchtliche Erfolgsbelohnung gewartet haben.

Unterdessen berichten verschiedene westliche Medien, darunter auch die Deutsche Welle, dass der Kreml die Auslieferung des Chefs des Kiewer Sicherheitsdienstes (SSB), Brigadegeneral Wassyl Malyuk, gefordert hat, weil er terroristische Anschläge in Russland geplant haben soll. Zwar hat Malyuk selbst die Verantwortung für den Bombenanschlag auf die Brücke von Kertsch (Krim) im Jahr 2022 übernommen. Aber wir können jetzt davon ausgehen, dass die Russen Beweise haben, um ihn für die Leitung der Gräueltat in der Crocus City Hall zur Rechenschaft zu ziehen.

In den sozialen Medien wird spekuliert, dass die Weigerung Kiews, die Anführer der Terrorkampagne auszuliefern, es Russland ermöglichen würde, die Ukraine zu einem terroristischen Staat zu erklären. Dies würde die Möglichkeit eröffnen, hochrangige ukrainische Beamte aus gerechtfertigten Gründen zu “neutralisieren”.

Wir brauchen jedoch nicht darüber zu spekulieren, was als nächstes kommen könnte. De facto ist Russlands derzeitige Offensive gegen die Ukraine auf eine neue, weitaus bedrohlichere Stufe eskaliert. Täglich werden militärische Kommandozentralen in der gesamten Ukraine, Ausbildungszentren und Konzentrationen ausländischer Söldner mit Luftangriffen und Raketen angegriffen. Und dann hat die Zerstörung des ukrainischen Stromnetzes eine neue Dimension erreicht.

Im Winter 2022-2023 sprachen alle westlichen Medien von russischen Angriffen auf die Energieinfrastruktur, davon, wie Russland angeblich versucht, die ukrainische Zivilbevölkerung ins Elend zu stürzen, indem es ihr inmitten der eisigen Kälte Wärme und Licht vorenthält. Doch in Wirklichkeit hat Russland damals nur Umspannwerke und andere Verteilungspunkte angegriffen. Mit dieser Zerstörung sollte die Stromversorgung unterbrochen werden, um einen taktischen Vorteil gegenüber den ukrainischen Streitkräften zu erlangen. Es war klar, dass die Umspannwerke und andere Anlagen innerhalb weniger Wochen oder Monate ersetzt werden konnten. Im Gegensatz dazu zerstören die Russen jetzt die Stromerzeugungsanlagen. Sie zu ersetzen, wird eine Frage von Jahren, nicht von Monaten sein.

Der Bürgermeister von Charkiw hat gestern gegenüber der Presse erklärt, dass die Stromversorgung der Stadt völlig zerstört ist. Diese Entwicklung passt sehr gut zu den Aufrufen in der Talkshow “Abend mit Wladimir Solowjow” in der vergangenen Woche, die Einwohner von Charkiw in ihren Autos in Richtung Westen zu schicken, bevor die Stadt dem Erdboden gleichgemacht wird. Damit sollte ein für alle Mal Schluss sein mit den Raketen und Artilleriegranaten, die Charkiw täglich in die benachbarte russische Region Belgorod schickt, um möglichst viele Zivilisten zu töten. Charkiw ist vielleicht noch nicht zerstört, aber es ist auf dem besten Weg, unbewohnbar zu werden.

Angesichts dieser massiven und unbestreitbaren Zerstörungen durch die Russen auf dem und außerhalb des Schlachtfelds schwindet die Tapferkeit von Zelenski und seiner Clique. Der ukrainische Präsident hat endlich öffentlich erklärt, dass es Zeit für Friedensverhandlungen sein könnte. Hoffen wir, dass Russlands Bösartigkeit nach Krokus die Ukrainer zur Vernunft bringt unddiesen furchtbaren Krieg beendet

11 thoughts on “Update on the Crocus terror attack

  1. We tend to think that Kiev going to the negotiating table will bring and end to the war. But there has to be some common understanding for that to work. I don’t see that Zelensky and his cronies, not to mention the West in general, agreeing to even the basic requirements to end the war. I just don’t see the common ground that an agreement can be made on. I believe this war continues until Ukraine is completely defeated and partitioned.

    Like

  2. By always choosing weaker opponents to fight, the United States has always given itself the opportunity to say, “We did them a favor,” when we are defeated. Noblesse oblige. That opportunity does not exist in the current setting. Whatever form the war takes it will continue until after the American elections.

    Like

  3. After the revelations that Ukraine was involved in the Crocus attack, the environment has changed. Russia will no longer allow any foreign diplomats in Ukraine. Zelensky and Kuleba, just to name a few are dead men walking. They better stay out of site.

    Like

  4. John Mearsheimer has said that he doesn’t see how this war can be brought to a good end. His fear is that the West is going to re-arm Ukraine and that the war is going to re-start within a few years. Mearsheimer talks about a “frozen conflict” that can turn into a new war somewhere in the next few years.

    Like

    1. Good for Mearsheimer. He is no Russia specialist.  This is the same Mearsheimer who has been saying for the past decade that Russia is in relentless decline and is not a Great PowerOnce upon a time he was listening to Steve Cohen for insights. Now perhaps he is taking advice from Anatol Lieven or some other propagandist journalistHorses for courses!

      Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour iPhone

      Like

      1. Mearsheimer may not be a Russia expert but he has certainly a much better understanding of the dynamics in geopolitics than many other socalled “analyst” (or propagandist) who is only interested in toeing, is paid to toe the official US / NATO / EU line.

        My personal view is that NATO will be gone within the next 10 years. I also have a scenario in which NATO won’t survive the next 12 months. Everyone thinks that european countries in NATO have been de-militarized by the war between Russia and the Ukraine (I agree) but I think the biggest threat for NATO is what is going to happen financially / economically in the US. Without the US NATO is “toast” and the US is “not in the best of financial shapes” (to put it friendly).

        I think that the age of “Super Powers” is over. Neither the US, Russia or China will remain / become a Super Power anymore. I think these 3 countries will “down size” to the status of “regional power” with only “regional influence”. Especially the US will fight “tooth and nail” to prevent this “decline” from happening but to no avail. The dice has been cast. How this is going to play out in Europe is still open for debate.

        It will be interesting to see what both Russia and China are going to do when the US Empire implodes. I am not so sure these 2 countries don’t have any “imperial ambitions” at all.

        George Kennan was right. NATO shouldn’t have expanded into Eastern Europe and now Europe & Ukraine are paying the price for that (predominantly US) expansion of the (US) empire. We can discuss whether or not NATO should have expanded into the former communist countries in eastern Europe. Russia opposed bringing the Ukraine for a good reason. I also think Russia is hell bent to “increase its influence” in the Baltic states and kick NATO out of these same Baltic States. And have better (think: ice free) access to the Baltic Sea. Currently Estonia is also part of NATO and that means that NATO troops are stationed in that country as well. Those NATO troops are a threat to the russian city of St. Petersburg.

        Did Russia give up its “ambitions” to make Odessa a russian city again, occupy all ukrainian territory east of the Dnjepr river and dismember the Ukraine even more ?

        I think Russia will get (more) involved in Syria the Middle East now Israel has bombed the iranian embassy in Damascus.

        There are A LOT OF moving parts and although I have a decent hunch of what is going to happen, I think future developments are going to surprise A LOT OF people around the world, including me.

        Remember the old chinese curse: “May you live in interesting times” !!!!!

        (Your work from this blog is regularly featured/quoted on the german blog “Moon Of Alabama.org”)

        Like

      2. Agree. Mearsheimer is – from time to time – what I would call too “US centric” and that’s something he shares with other US analysts. But this does not negate the fact that he has a good grasp on geopolitical dynamics.

        Mearsheimer’s general line of thinking is that he thinks that the US won’t give up their “imperial expansion” anytime soon. Only a US of russian devastating defeat will bring a lasting peace between these (great) imperial powers (I use the word “imperial” deliberately), something akin to the defeat of nazi Germany. In that regard I agree with Mearsheimer.

        The same scenario can be applied to the “tensions” between the US and China. In this regard I consider the war between the Ukraine and Russia just to be one chapter in the continuing “confrontation” between the US on the one hand and Russia, China and Iran on the other hand.

        Like

    2. What Ukraine and what Ukrainians is going to be rearmed?

      The country is in a demographic death-spiral, it’s infrastructure is getting pummeled and it’s economy is moribund.

      Even sustaining rump Ukraine as a zombie-state, would be highly expensive. Never mind trying to rearm it. Assuming that can even be done.

      All of course predicated on the Russians letting NATO do it.

      Like

Comments are closed.