Tonight’s edition of the news and analysis program Sixty Minutes hosted by Duma member Yevgeny Popov and his wife Olga Skabeyeva was almost entirely devoted to coverage of the country’s latest hypersonic missile “Oreshnik,” (hazelnut tree) which has a range of more than 5,000 km, putting it at the outer limits of Intermediate Range and lower limits of Intercontinental ballistic missiles. The Oreshnik was used yesterday in an unprecedented strike on industrial facilities in the Ukrainian city of Dnepr (Dnipro in Ukrainian), a city of one million inhabitants, fourth largest in Ukraine and the capital of the Dnepropetrovsk oblast.
The program consisted of the following segments:
- A detailed explanation of the distinguishing characteristics of Oreshnik, including its speed and the reasons for its invulnerability to all known air defense systems, its time in flight to major European capitals, and more. In yesterday’s attack, the six MIRV warheads were conventional but devastating due to speed-related initial force. It was noted that the Oreshnik flew at Mach 10, i.e. 12,000 km per hour, or twice the speed of America’s Patriot interceptors. It is also highly maneuverable in flight making its evasion of all would-be interceptors a certainty.
- Lengthy video clips of American and European mainstream media reports on the Oreshnik and the attack on Dnipro. Note that these directed attention at the military significance of this new Russian offensive weapon for the correlation of forces on the ground in Ukraine, which as the Russians point out was not at all what yesterday’s experiment was about.
- Lengthy video excerpts from Vladimir Putin’s address to the nation announcing the missile attack on Dnipro and saying that the United States was automatically forewarned a half hour before the missile launch from Astrakhan using the nuclear attack preventive informational channels set up for the New Start strategic arms agreements. Most importantly Putin stressed Russia’s readiness to use this and other weapons in Russia’s arsenal against countries whose missiles are being fired at RF territory. Deciphered, he is saying that military facilities of the United States and Britain may be struck by Russian missiles if they continue the attacks on Russia which they made this past Sunday and Monday from Ukrainian territory using their ATACMS and Storm Shadow.
Indeed, in his address Vladimir Putin makes clear that yesterday’s use of the Oreshnik missile against Dnipro was a direct response to the American and British attacks. It was an unmistakable message of firm intent to respond in a mirror-image fashion to anything that Western powers may think of doing to his country. That military production facilities of Ukraine were destroyed was a useful side-effect, not the main reason.
To drive the message of absolute Russian technological superiority home, Putin emphasized that in such retaliatory attacks Russia will give advance notice to ensure that civilians have time to flee. Russia does this in the knowledge that its adversaries have no possibility of intercepting what it is sending their way.
Mr Putin stated clearly that this type of missile was created and is being deployed in answer to America’s changing strategy of intimidating its adversaries by means of short and intermediate range missiles installed and potentially fired from friendly countries in Europe and elsewhere along the periphery of the RF rather than using its nuclear triad as in the past. The USA may in this way cut flight time of its nuclear armed missiles to reach Russian cities down to ten to twenty minutes. With Oreshnik, Russia now has reduced similarly the flying time to impact in London, Berlin and Brussels.
Moscow’s expectation from today’s warning backed up by yesterday’s Oreshnik attack on the city of Dnepr is that the incoming Trump administration will not care a fig about Ukraine’s interests as it gropes for a solution to end the war and will instead pay close attention to Russia’s security concerns and demands.
Apart from the Oreshnik story, today’s edition of Sixty Minutes also was heavy on war reports from the front lines in Donbas, showing the extensive destruction of NATO tanks, armored personnel carriers and the enemy’s fortified positions using captured Ukrainian video as well as what Russian war correspondents are sending in. They showed Defense Minister Belousov saying that the Russian military has now destroyed all of Ukraine’s elite troops so that Kiev will be utterly unable to stage a counter-attack on the ground in 2025.
In summation, Russian television viewers today would have had no need to go to a cinema to see reenactments of WWII battles or other armed conflicts invented by movie producers. State television was serving up only War, War and War.
©Gilbert Doctorow, 2024
Postscript: a colleague in Germany has just informed me that among the six targets of the Russian attack on Dnipro 21 November was the Rheinmetal factory for maintaining and repairing Leopards and other German armored vehicles. This was a direct message to the German Military Industrial Complex and, no doubt, prompted Chancellor Scholz’s description of Russia’s new capability as terrifying.
Translation below in German (Andreas Mylaeus)
11 Minuten bis Berlin, 14 Minuten bis Brüssel, 19 Minuten bis London: Russlands neue ballistische Hyperschall-Mittelstreckenrakete zeigt, was sie kann
Die heutige Ausgabe der Nachrichten- und Analyse-Sendung „Sechzig Minuten“, die von dem Duma-Mitglied Jewgeni Popow und seiner Frau Olga Skabeyewa moderiert wird, war fast ausschließlich der Berichterstattung über die neueste Hyperschall-Rakete des Landes, „Oreshnik“ (Haselnussbaum), gewidmet, die eine Reichweite von mehr als 5.000 km hat und damit an der äußeren Grenze der Mittelstrecken- und an der unteren Grenze der Interkontinentalraketen liegt. Die Oreshnik wurde gestern bei einem beispiellosen Angriff auf Industrieanlagen in der ukrainischen Stadt Dnepr (ukrainisch Dnipro) eingesetzt, einer Stadt mit einer Million Einwohnern, der viertgrößten Stadt der Ukraine und Hauptstadt der Oblast Dnepropetrowsk.
Das Programm bestand aus den folgenden Abschnitten:
- Eine detaillierte Erklärung der besonderen Merkmale der Oreshnik, einschließlich ihrer Geschwindigkeit und der Gründe für ihre Unverwundbarkeit gegenüber allen bekannten Luftverteidigungssystemen, ihrer Flugzeit zu den wichtigsten europäischen Hauptstädten und vieles mehr. Bei dem Angriff gestern waren die sechs MIRV-Sprengköpfe konventionell, aber aufgrund der geschwindigkeitsbedingten Aufschlagskraft verheerend. Es wurde festgestellt, dass die Oreshnik mit Mach 10 flog, d.h. mit 12.000 km pro Stunde, was der doppelten Geschwindigkeit der amerikanischen Patriot-Abfangraketen entspricht. Sie ist auch im Flug äußerst manövrierfähig, was es ihr ermöglicht, allen potenziellen Abfangsystemen zu entkommen.
- Lange Videoclips mit Berichten amerikanischer und europäischer Mainstream-Medien über die Oreshnik und den Angriff auf Dnipro. Beachten Sie, dass diese die Aufmerksamkeit auf die militärische Bedeutung dieser neuen russischen Offensivwaffe für das Kräfteverhältnis am Boden in der Ukraine lenkten, was, wie die Russen betonen, überhaupt nicht das Ziel des gestrigen Experiments war.
- Lange Videoausschnitte aus Wladimir Putins Ansprache an die Nation, in der er den Raketenangriff auf Dnipro ankündigte und sagte, dass die Vereinigten Staaten automatisch eine halbe Stunde vor dem Raketenstart von Astrachan über die für die New Start-Abkommen über strategische Waffen eingerichteten Informationskanäle zur Verhinderung von Nuklearangriffen vorgewarnt wurden. Am wichtigsten war, dass Putin die Bereitschaft Russlands betonte, diese und andere Waffen im russischen Arsenal gegen Länder einzusetzen, deren Raketen auf das Territorium der Russischen Föderation abgefeuert werden. Im Klartext bedeutet dies, dass militärische Einrichtungen der Vereinigten Staaten und Großbritanniens von russischen Raketen getroffen werden können, wenn diese ihre Angriffe auf Russland fortsetzen, die sie am vergangenen Sonntag und Montag von ukrainischem Gebiet aus mit ihren ATACMS- und Storm-Shadow-Raketen durchgeführt haben.
Tatsächlich machte Wladimir Putin in seiner Ansprache deutlich, dass der gestrige Einsatz der Oreschnik-Rakete gegen Dnipro eine direkte Reaktion auf die amerikanischen und britischen Angriffe war. Es war eine unmissverständliche Botschaft der festen Absicht, auf alles, was die westlichen Mächte seinem Land antun könnten, spiegelbildlich zu reagieren. Dass militärische Produktionsanlagen der Ukraine zerstört wurden, war ein nützlicher Nebeneffekt, nicht der Hauptgrund.
Um die Botschaft der absoluten technologischen Überlegenheit Russlands zu unterstreichen, betonte Putin, dass Russland bei solchen Vergeltungsschlägen im Voraus warnen werde, um sicherzustellen, dass Zivilisten Zeit zur Flucht haben. Russland tut dies in dem Wissen, dass seine Gegner keine Möglichkeit haben, die von Russland in deren Richtung geschickten Raketen abzufangen.
Putin erklärte unmissverständlich, dass diese Art von Raketen als Reaktion auf die veränderte Strategie Amerikas entwickelt und eingesetzt wurde, seine Gegner durch Kurz- und Mittelstreckenraketen einzuschüchtern, die in befreundeten Ländern in Europa und anderswo an der Peripherie der Russischen Föderation stationiert sind und potenziell von dort abgefeuert werden können, anstatt wie bisher seine nukleare Triade einzusetzen. Auf diese Weise könnten die USA die Flugzeit ihrer nuklear bewaffneten Raketen, die russische Städte erreichen, auf zehn bis zwanzig Minuten verkürzen. Mit Oreschnik hat Russland nun die Flugzeit bis zum Aufprall in London, Berlin und Brüssel auf ähnliche Weise verkürzt.
Moskau erwartet aufgrund der heutigen Warnung, die durch den gestrigen Angriff der Oreshnik auf die Stadt Dnepr untermauert wurde, dass die kommende Trump-Regierung sich nicht im Geringsten um die Interessen der Ukraine scheren wird, während sie nach einer Lösung zur Beendigung des Krieges sucht, und stattdessen den Sicherheitsbedenken und Forderungen Russlands große Aufmerksamkeit schenken wird.
Abgesehen von der Oreshnik-Geschichte war die heutige Ausgabe von Sechzig Minuten auch voll von Kriegsberichten von der Front im Donbass, die die weitreichende Zerstörung von NATO-Panzern, gepanzerten Mannschaftstransportern und befestigten Stellungen des Feindes zeigten, wobei sowohl erbeutete ukrainische Videos als auch Material russischer Kriegsberichterstatter verwendet wurden. Sie zeigten Verteidigungsminister Belousov, der sagte, dass das russische Militär nun alle Elitetruppen der Ukraine vernichtet habe, sodass Kiew im Jahr 2025 völlig unfähig sein werde, einen Gegenangriff am Boden zu starten.
Zusammenfassend lässt sich sagen, dass russische Fernsehzuschauer heute nicht mehr ins Kino gehen müssten, um Nachstellungen von Schlachten des Zweiten Weltkriegs oder anderen von Filmproduzenten erfundenen bewaffneten Konflikten zu sehen. Das Staatsfernsehen servierte nur Krieg, Krieg und Krieg.
Nachtrag: Ein Kollege aus Deutschland hat mich gerade darüber informiert, dass sich unter den sechs Zielen des russischen Angriffs auf Dnipro am 21. November auch das Rheinmetall-Werk befand, in dem Leopard-Panzer und andere deutsche Panzerfahrzeuge gewartet und repariert werden. Dies war eine direkte Botschaft an den deutschen militärisch-industriellen Komplex und hat Bundeskanzler Scholz zweifellos dazu veranlasst, die neuen Fähigkeiten Russlands als furchterregend zu bezeichnen.
It’s much easier to read you here than in Substack, Gilbert. In fact, I cannot read this article in full there, despite being subscribed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is worth pointing out that had the Donald not withdrawn the US from the INF Treaty, the Oreshkin missile would not exist. Therefore, I expect him to double down.
LikeLike
It’s Oreshnik (орешник), not Oreshkin. A hazel tree or grove.
LikeLike
Let’s turn it into a chess match. How does the CIA get what it wants now? As I’ve said, ad nauseam, they’ll never have another Ukraine. That they play the hardest kind of hardball is very evident. But how do they turn that into victory now? This is not an idle question. To quote from the movie The Hidden, they want the car, they need the keys. I don’t know. But we’ll find out. Any thoughts?
LikeLike
A Storm Shadow travels perhaps 600 mph, say 1000 km/h downhill with a following wind. It’s subsonic. It’s an air-launch cruise missile with a turbofan engine. So ten times slower than Oreshnik, at least. It is not a rocket. Surely you at least know that after two years or more of its deployment?
Ted Postol of MIT talked about MIRV “vehicles” on one of your punditocracy colleagues podcasts today. Described how they arrive at roughly the same place at different times, due to, um, physics. With slides of trajectories from 40 years ago. Of course, you can adjust the target point as well if you wish. That’s how your average garden variety ICBM works. Postol knows a bit more technically than some bloke who’s a Russian MP equivalent with a side-hustle of a TV show, methinks, if that’s where you gathered your info. The Orestnik MIRV sections also likely split into sub munitions and /or decoys themselves before the final light show caught on video, Postol theorized. That’s how there were more than six explosions. Also, of course, you cannot practically shoot this system down as he was at pains to point out. Too many targets, all moving too fast, all inside a plasma. Good luck with that.
Zelensky, of course, being as thick as a post, did not listen to Putin, and at once asked “NATO” to supply AD systems to shoot down Oreshnik. Impossible. Which means he missed the entire point, and yes, I think he’s that dumb. You cannot practically intercept Oreshnik and its MIRVs and submunitions. Given that cold-weather lizard-like lack of brainpower running You-crain, you can bet Lloyd Austin, intellectual extraordinaire and his pals Blinky and the Brain back in DC cannot grasp the significance of Oreshnik either. It is checkmate. They’re still processing defeat, and if true to form, will bluster and BS their way out of feeling defeated, ending up getting us all killed by firing off more ATACMS to “test the waters”, upping the escalatory ladder until a few tactical nukes wake them up from their narcissistic psychopathic ways. At which point, it’s game over for us all as their chests puff out in righteous indignation and they respond as only sociopaths can with no regard for tomorrow.
Does Putin feel he has to inform “NATO” when deploying Oreshnik if it’s entirely a military target? You know, with not much chance of civilian casualties as in the case of a factory or a city? That to me is the real unknown. If it were me, I wouldn’t inform the Western dopes in advance in such cases. Easy to point out the difference in targets afterwards when the bleating starts about that “killer” Putin.
LikeLike
Thanks for your careful editing of the text: indeed there was an inadvertant typo on “oreshnik’ which is now corrected. regrettable or not the non-technical among us, myself included, are obliged to bring the full dimension of the Russian technical achievement and threat to the attention of the broad, equally ‘non-technical’ public given that proper specialists are sitting on their hands. And we do make our misstatements here and there. in journalism, the race between speed and accuracy, speed wins, for getter or ill.
LikeLike
Cute sd hominem snark about members of the Biden administration and Zelensky reveal a complete ignorance of the situation. Everything coming out of Washington and Ukraine is scripted in Langley. This is a very disciplined attack on Russia that is the culmination of a century of reaction to the Bolshevik revolution. This insane reaction has destroyed American civilization. Permanently. The only important question to be asked is what will its death throes leave standing in the”West”. Footnote: does Postol know the budget of the CIA? Does he know what it does? No. Noone does. In our cave we only perceive it’s shadow.
LikeLike
Why is Russia still standing? Because of one man. Vladimir Putin. He knows what’s going on because he has observed it firsthand. He knows his enemy. He has changed the world.
LikeLike
Thank you from New Zealand Dr Doctorow for your excellent reports. We only get the latest Western narrative in our media here. Complete rubbish. The control runs deep. Our latest government seem to be made up of hopeful US vassals, so very disappointing. We look forward daily for your posts. We are very grateful.
LikeLike
The history of humanity has been compressed to 2 months.
LikeLike
I have serious doubts about Putin’s response to the West’s crossing his reddest line. It seems that the Russian president believes that the best way to respond was to continue rhetorical exercises. The Oreshnik demo is meaningless, and likely a big strategic mistake. You don’t show scary stuff to the enemy. You use it and tell him what it was that hit him after.
I am beginning to be convinced by Paul Craig Roberts. Putin does not fully grasp the psychology prevailing in the West, and is making a huge blunder in allowing the Yanks and the Brits to think they own him. I understand caution but this is not being cautious. He correctly named the western allies as co-belligerent in the Ukraine war if they manage their missiles against targets on “undisputed” Russian territory. But he made a classical error in judgment in calling it an “act of war”. It was an error because in normal use of human language (as understood in the West) it signals resolve to respond to it as an act of war that is by action (not another lecture). Immediately after the West tested if he meant what he said he opted again to do a speech, to reassure them that although he had the means to stop their insanity he was not ready to that yet.
Instead, after the first attacks, the Russian president should have suspended diplomatic relations with the US and Britain and stay silent. He should have approved a suitable, commensurate, target outside of Ukraine (in my thinking a British one would give Pentagon a real scare) and hit it. Then get back on the pulpit and tell them they better stop.
LikeLike
On the contrary, surely it was correct for Russia to target Ukraine, not London, in using for the first time its hypersonic missile. Time to reflect. allows the dense, slow-witted brains of western countries them to perceive what can happen in their countries, if they continue to deliver long-range missiles for Ukraine to attack Russia. I understand Britain is now in a bad way, militarily, and economically, so it will deservedly be suffering big strife internally with this added blow. to its “prestige.” – Kay
LikeLike