‘Judging Freedom’: How Weak Is NATO?
Today’s discussion with Judge Andrew Napolitano went into the reasons why the commitment of all NATO member states yesterday to raise their military budgets to 5% of GDP from the present 2% was political theater as much as the fawning of Secretary General Rutte over Donald Trump was theater.
However, this theater was not staged for our amusement. It had business to achieve, which was to prepare an exit ramp from NATO for Mr Trump and the USA. Of course, the American president cannot take the country out of NATO in the legal sense, since that would require a two-thirds vote of Congress which he cannot expect to receive. But he can sharply curtail American contributions to the NATO budget and reduce US military forces on the continent now.
I compared this to the political theater that Trump directed just a few days later when he sent B2 bombers and cruise missiles to attack Iranian nuclear bases from which everything of value had already been removed and then declared that he had destroyed the Iranian nuclear program. That too was a very serious piece of business. He thereby deprived prime minister Netanyahu of all reason to continue his war on Iran and a cease fire followed almost immediately.
The overriding message I was making is that we should pay attention not to the words of Trump and his associates, which are largely double-talk intended to confuse the journalists, whom Trump despises. We should follow the direct consequences of his actions, which, for the moment, are making a very considerable positive contribution to international relations.
One thought on “‘Judging Freedom’: How Weak Is NATO?”
Comments are closed.