Putin has been wrong about this war from the beginning

In this essay, I will take on the Putin Hero Worship that is all too common among Russian cheerleaders in Alternative Media. Their misreading of the man and his conduct of the war will multiply 10 times over when a peace is concluded that meets many, though not all of Russia’s objectives.   Yes, we told you so, they will be crowing: peace has come because Putin has made all the right moves and trashed the West.

However, there is a strong argument to make for exactly the opposite interpretation of what has been going on for the nearly four years of this war, namely that it got off to a very bad start and has been drawn out needlessly because of the peculiar strategy that Team Putin put in place and has stuck with notwithstanding mounting fatalities and a worsening international environment that threatens to escalate from the present proxy war against Russia into a Europe wide kinetic war that will devastate the Continent

. If indeed the war ends in the next couple of months, it will be largely due to the efforts of Donald Trump, who is determined to reach a geopolitical settlement with Russia for his own Realpolitik reasons, namely to break up the Russia-China alliance. Regrettably, I agree with Trump that Putin would fight on for years to come in the flawed belief that he is sparing lives by his war of attrition approach and that a total military victory is achievable.  It is not, given the go-for-broke irrational commitment to continuing the war by the EU Member States.

As I have been saying for some time, this war will end and there will likely be Ukrainian capitulation thanks to the political collapse of the Kiev regime, not because the Ukrainian army has been driven from the field of battle. And Kiev is being pushed towards political collapse today by Team Trump more than by anyone else.

                                                                           ****

If we may go back to the very start of the Special Military Operation, I maintain that Team Putin had not done due diligence regarding the likely Ukrainian army response to an invasion and had not fielded an invasion force in the numbers essential for it to succeed.

In my chat with Peter Lavelle on the podcast The Gaggle a couple of weeks ago, Peter reminded me that in the weeks before the start of the Special Military Operation, when I was still a regular guest on the RT show ‘CrossTalk,’ I had been one of the very few analysts in Alternative Media to have predicted the Russian invasion. I do not remember that, but it could well have been so because I am no military expert and would not have seen that the 150,000 troops that the Russians amassed across the Belarus border from Ukraine were only one third the number that normal military doctrine tells you are needed to perform such an operation as crossing into enemy territory to capture the capital and force regime change.

Just a few months into the SMO, I heard from a taxi driver during the hour-long trip from my apartment in an outlying borough of St Petersburg to the city center how Team Putin has stunned his own military intelligence people by not consulting with them before staging the invasion.  And what would a taxi driver know about such things, you may ask.  Well, this driver just happened to be a retired military intelligence officer who remained in touch with his former colleagues and heard the story from them.

Yes, in Russia at various times taxi drivers have been exceptional sources of information. Just remember that Vladimir Putin himself admitted in a public Q&A a year or so ago, that at the start of the 90s he, too, had been a taxi driver for a while just to put bread on the table, given the general economic collapse.

It is fairly obvious that Team Putin expected the Ukrainian military to raise the white flag at the first sign of Russian troops invading, just as they had done in 2014 on Crimea.  One might guess that Putin and his close advisers did not appreciate how effectively British and other NATO trainers had been during the intervening 8 years in reshaping the Ukrainian army. The Russian appeals to the Ukrainian officers to rebel against the extremist nationalist government in Kiev and against the Nazi battalions in their own midst fell on deaf ears.

Indeed, you may go on to ask whether a good people manager like Putin could really ignore the protocol of government administration and not consult with the agency responsible for providing military intelligence.  But this very behavior has in the past two weeks been repeated in a manner for us all to see when Putin completely sidelined Sergei Lavrov and the entire Ministry of Foreign Affairs from the peace negotiations with the USA and Ukraine, relying instead on a relative outsider and neophyte in such matters, Kirill Dmitriev.

Indeed, if the Russian command had poor military and political intelligence on the enemy at the start, it has not become better informed ever since. I point to the ‘surprise’ Ukrainian incursion into the Kursk oblast of the Russian Federation that it took more than six months of fierce fighting to uproot and expel. It is hard to understand why his Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov was not sacked over this disgraceful failure to secure the Russian Federation borders, why no one had checked the fortifications that were supposed to have been built with federal money in Belgorod and Kursk, but never were, or were built with inferior concrete because of local government corruption.

The whole strategy of waging war ‘the Russian way’ brought in by Vladimir Putin  in February 2022, in contrast to the U.S. style ‘shock and awe’ to overwhelm the enemy, has dragged out the war vastly longer than was necessary, has created more killed and severely maimed Russian and Ukrainian soldiers, and has invited Western intervention which all could have been avoided had Putin followed Soviet practice in such matters and used a hammer to crush the fly instead of a napkin.

The lessons of the Soviet invasions of Hungary in 1956 and of Czechoslovakia in 1968 were precisely that massive troop presence must be brought to bear for successful regime change by force of arms. In both cases, the Soviet invasions were cruel, but in the end relatively few people died and the whole exercise was over in a matter of days, at most weeks, not years as is the case today.

These lessons have not been absorbed by Team Putin to this day. For inexplicable reasons the Boss in the Kremlin refuses to make a decapitating strike in Kiev to end the fighting at once without further loss of life.

As I say above, it is the intervention of Donald Trump that is bringing down the Kiev regime. The United States stands behind the anti-corruption investigations that already have greatly weakened Zelensky’s position following the forced resignation of his head of the Presidential Administration and power behind the throne, Andrii Yermak.  It is Team Trump who have been sidelining Europe, letting the air out of the balloon of the Coalition of the Willing, and preparing the way for capitulation by Kiev before anyone in Brussels can raise a finger.

Don’t get me wrong. I have the greatest respect for Vladimir Putin as the man who put Russia back on its feet economically, socially and in military might after the collapse and disgrace of the 1990s. For these achievements, he may be honored for decades to come with monuments all around the Federation. But as we say in the business world: ‘horses for courses.’  And Putin, the nation builder in peacetime has been making too many wrong moves as Commander in Chief of a nation at war.

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2025

Kazakhstan Ukraine Tension: Ukraine Drone Attack on CPC Terminal Has Created Spark | NewsX World, 30 November

I consider my most important discussion point in this interview the observation that the attack on Russia’s Novorossiisk oil terminal which has shut down 80% of Kazakhstan’s oil exports was by one or more Ukrainian naval drones. It is reasonable to believe that the British have enabled this attack which punishes not Russia but the American companies that own the wells and partly own the pipeline transporting the oil to the now damaged port terminal on the Black Sea. Let us remember that it is precisely the British who were behind the naval drone attack on the Kerch bridge connecting Crimea to mainland Russia more than a year ago and also behind drone attacks on Russian naval vessels based in Sevastopol. It would be useful if this question of British dirty work were put to Prime Minister Starmer for clarifications.

Russia Ukraine Peace Deal: Ukraine prepares high-level talks with United States | NewsX World

This video interview on the Indian broadcaster yesterday morning starts at minute 15 and ends at minute 21. It deals with three issues: the significance of Andrii Yermak’s forced resignation for what the US-Ukraine negotiations in Washington will look like at the start of the coming week; the ‘humanitarian’ concerns which Trump say drive his intervention to end the war; and the Realpolitik explanation for his priority on luring Russia away from its close alliance with China.

Today’s chat with Rasheed Muhammad on TheRedPill Diaries

Rasheed and I were very lucky with the timing of today’s program, because there were dramatic changes in the situation of the Russia-Ukraine War coming out of the denial of confiscation of Russian state assets by Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever and out of the resignation of Andrii Yermak, the power behind Zelensky’s throne, following a raid on his house by the Anti-Corruption Agency in Kiev. 

The chat is nearly an hour long and covers many issues going back to the 2013 Maidan demonstrations and 2014 overthrow of Ukrianian president Yanukovich and coming straight up to today and the outlook for political collapse in Kiev in the days to come.

Ukrainian capitulation in the coming weeks may be expected….thanks to Mr. Trump

Ukrainian capitulation in the coming weeks may be expected….thanks to Mr. Trump

I frankly admit that I have underestimated Trump’s capacity for duplicity that he has used to outmaneuver his opponents abroad in the EU, in Ukraine and at home in the USA, on Capitol Hill and in the media.

I have no doubt that Team Trump are behind the corruption investigation raid on the home of the power behind the throne in Kiev, Andrii Yermak, who was forced to resign late today.  The fall of Zelensky on corruption charges cannot be more than days away.

Accordingly, I must revise my views on what happened at the US-Ukraine meeting in Geneva at the start of the week that produced a revised 19-point plan to suit the Zelensky gang which we were told would be foisted on the Russians. No, that was pure political theater and we may assume that the original 29- point plan developed jointly by Steve Witkoff for the American side and Kirill Dmitriev for the Russians will be the basis for the renewed US-Russian talks on ending the war that likely will take place next week in Budapest chaired by Trump and Putin.

This is all happening with blinding speed that has left the Trump’s opponents speechless.

However, one European leader did have something to say in the past day that also contributes to the foreseeable political collapse of Ukraine and possibly to the collapse of the war mongers who dominate present European politics.  I have in mind the Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever who rejected von der Leyen’s insistent promotion of confiscation of frozen Russian state assets held in Euroclear now not only because of financial risk that the confiscation will be reversed in court challenges by Russia that will follow but, more importantly today, because the confiscation would work directly against the ongoing peace negotiations.   So von der Leyen’s perfidy to European interests in peace on the Continent has been called out.

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2025

 Belgium cautions EU on frozen Russian assets | NewsX World

and

Ukraine Corruption | Hungary – Russia Meet | EU Frozen Assets | Eurozone | NewsX World

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKZKjPqChXw

NewsX World: Putin announces military modernization

NewsX World:  Putin announces military modernization

This midday interview on the Indian television station NewsX World featured several items from breaking news, including President Putin’s remarks at the ongoing Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) meeting in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. Putin said that Russia will be making available to the CSTO Member States its latest military hardware that has proven itself on the field of battle. As I say here, providing ‘toys for the boys’ is a sensible way of raising loyalty among these former republics of the USSR and of keeping out of Central Asia, in particular, the meddling US, British and French spoilers.

I will be attending a conference on Eurasian security at the Russian Embassy in Brussels this evening and if there is any information of value to the Community that comes out of that event I will post it here tomorrow.

The other key item in this video concerns Erdogan’s response to President Macron’s efforts to bring Turkey into a British and French force that would be introduced into Ukraine ahead of implementation of a cease-fire to provide security to the Ukrainians.

News X Eurozone: a friendly debate on the status of the Ukraine peace talks

Occasionally the production team at the Indian broadcaster News X puts me together with someone from the other side of the barricades, so to speak, to discuss the latest developments in the Ukraine war, now in the Ukraine peace talks.

Going back nine months or more, News X was just getting started filling its stable of experts for these programs and, frankly speaking, the first panelists they selected were rather primitive Ukrainian propagandists. I backed out of that format and was subsequently only interviewed on my own. 

However, now I find that they have brought in some very good spokesmen for the other side of the issues of the day and it was an unexpected pleasure to engage in a debate of sorts with a mainstream kind of expert. Curiously, though we have very different big picture thinking, on the issues put to us by the moderator, especially with respect to the likelihood of von der Leyen’s getting her hands on the frozen Russian assets in Euroclear, we were singing from the same scores.

Pay no attention to the titles on the video. This is a news hour broadcast and the first 5 minutes deal with the breaking news in a great many different places. After that it is strictly Ukraine and the questions to me and my fellow panelist.

‘Judging Freedom’ edition of 26 November: Can Putin Tolerate More War?

In today’s chat we discussed several very important issues of the day as a flood of news relating to the peace negotiations come out of Washington, Moscow, Abu Dhabi and the European capitals.

I report on the very evident split between Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Vladimir Putin over the unconventional and now apparently failing procedure by which negotiations for peace are being held. Lavrov yesterday strongly criticized the use of back channels and entirely sidelining his own ministry which normally should be in charge of such important talks that require great secrecy and also great diplomatic competence on the part of the leading figures in the talks.  Lavrov said that he has not seen the revised plan, now counting 18 points and so cannot comment but does not expect to see anything good in it, since the leaks allowed the wrecking team from Europe to nullify what was good about the original 28-point plan.

Today, President Putin’s special advisor on foreign relations Yuri Ushakov made a public statement to the effect that he has seen the revised plan and that it can be used as a basis for further talks.  Let me be clear:  Ushakov is a seasoned diplomat with a lot of relevant experience considering that he was the Russian ambassador to Washington from 1998 to 2008. But today he is a law unto himself, not a member of the diplomatic corps. He may be said to speak for Putin.  And now we find that his position on the peace process is diametrically opposed to that of the Foreign Minister.  This is a remarkable development in Moscow that one very rarely sees. What we may guess is that Putin’s prioritization on establishing good relations with the United States has drawn him into the backchannel solution, which now is going sour.

Judge Napolitano raised the issue of Ursula von der Leyen’s pack of lies and hypocrisy speech yesterday regarding the way forward on the peace talks.  A two-minute excerpt from that speech was put up on the screen. The woman is very dangerous for the future of Europe.  Let us assume that she has a very solid bomb shelter beneath the Commission headquarters.  But that gives little comfort to the rest of us. Should she have her way, in a year or two Western Europe may look a lot like war ravaged Ukraine does today.

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2025

US’ 28-Point Peace Plan Empowers Russia, Diminishes Ukraine? | WION GAME PLAN

US’ 28-Point Peace Plan Empowers Russia, Diminishes Ukraine? | WION GAME PLAN

It was a pleasure this morning to have a 10-minute online chat with presenter Shivan Chanana of India’s largest English-language global broadcaster, WION, who have more than 9 million subscribers.

In keeping with the shifting currents in high politics in Delhi, which always walked a tightrope between the USA and Russia (formerly USSR),  the broadcaster has shifted back and forth between favoring Mainstream commentaries on the Russia-Ukraine war from US military experts over the past several months and then coming back to me for a contrarian opinion as they did today.  Please note that the single largest audience I have ever had in podcasts, more than 350,000 views, was precisely on WION at perhaps 9 months ago.

NewsX World: US, Ukraine Draft Refined Peace Framework

This link to a brief interview from yesterday has just arrived and I am pleased to share it with the Community. Pay no attention to the ‘China Warning’ heading because this is a news digest and the Russia-Ukraine War is the first topic on the interview agenda after the presenter reads off the top news of the hour.

Yes, as you will notice, my expectations from this latest Trump peace initiative are changing by the day. I emphasize that I have no angst changing my position when the object under examination changes, and the evolution of this initiative is anything but consistent.

Some are saying that Team Trump is overseeing a ‘bait and switch’ operation in which the Russians were offered one fairly acceptable 28-point plan and now instead they will be required to agree to a much less desirable Ukrainian-edited plan.  That may be.  But I think something more characteristic of Trump is underway:  he is preparing for the parties NOT to agree to his mediated settlement and then will lower the boom on both – withdrawing US intel and military hardware support for Ukraine and imposing new draconian sanctions on Russia. This will allow him to wiggle out of the entire project of bringing peace to Ukraine and tell the Europeans to deal with it on their own. 

I mention this as a possible explanation for the peculiar behavior of Dan Driscoll and Steve Witkoff in Geneva, letting the Ukrainians gut the original proposal and then smiling at the end and saying everything is very constructive.