Russian television celebrates full ‘liberation’ of the Lugansk oblast (LNR)

To my good fortune, here in Belgium internet reception of  now works perfectly with respect to live broadcasts. I am thus able to share with readers impressions from the programs I follow most closely: Sixty Minutes, Evening with Vladimir Solovyov and News of the Week hosted by Dmitri Kiselyov.

The past week provided Russian state television with a cornucopia of important events foreign and domestic.  These included, in the West, the gathering of the G7 leaders in Schloss Elmau, Bavaria and the NATO Summit in Madrid. At both events, Russia, its president Vladimir Putin, and the ongoing war in Ukraine were central to the talks and therefore of special interest to RF audiences. 

Russian television coverage was partly provided by Vesti correspondents permanently based in the EU,  like Anastasya Popova, partly by reporting from major Western television channels and print media. It bears mention that some of the segments from foreign television were quite extensive, giving a full airing to the anti-Russian rants. The Russian programmers obviously had no doubt that the absurdities and plain ignorance exposed in the speeches and comments to journalists of one after another EU or NATO worthy ensured that no one in their own audience would be misled and that a great many would be amused.

The overriding nature of the Russian television presentations was mockery of the European leaders for their servility to Uncle Sam and persistence in ratcheting up sanctions against Russia that are destructive of their own economies as proven by separate footage on consumer reactions to the rampant inflation and threatening shortages of gas and heating oil in coming weeks.  

On the subject of servility, no video was more damaging to its central personality than that of Emmanuel Macron interrupting  Biden’s conversation with Jake Sullivan during a walk from one venue to another in Madrid to tell the Boss confidentially that France was doing its utmost to cut import of Russian hydrocarbons but could not see any solutions since his own telephone conversation with a counterpart in the Gulf made it clear no significant increase in oil production there could be expected. Macron had not counted on a French journalist intercepting and later publishing this revelation.  The clip was shown repeatedly on Russian television over the weekend.

At both the G7 and at the NATO Summit, Boris Johnson stood out as the most determined advocate for further military and financial assistance to Ukraine and as the most determined opponent of any peace negotiations. This made him especially vulnerable to malicious Russian commentary, which he invited by his comportment in all venues as the lead jokester or clown among the European leaders.

Johnson made the absurd proposal at a NATO Summit lunch that they all throw off their shirts to show Putin that they also had great pectorals.  This indirect tribute to Putin for his widely disseminated macho photos taken on vacation in the past was picked up with alacrity by Russian television, which also quoted Vladimir Vladimirovich asking whether the NATO leaders proposed to strip only above the waist or further down and noting that in any event it would be a hideous sight. 

Dmitry Kiselyov on Sunday night took this attack on the British Prime Minister one step further, putting up photos of Boris in his sweat shirt, with his heavy chest in need of a bra, per Kiselyov.  This aspersion regarding Johnson’s sexual identity was a biting response to Johnson’s offhand remarks to journalists that the war with Ukraine would never have been unleashed had Putin been a woman. Russian audiences were treated as well to other photos of Boris in his jogging shorts, looking very much like the neighborhood fat boy, with his weighty thighs bare for all to see.

As for Joe Biden, Russian state television picked up and re-broadcast all of his flubbed lines and signs of physical deterioration (the fall from his bicycle) that came their way from U.S. television channels. This perfectly served their editorial line about the degradation of Western political elites.

Closer to home, Russian media could feast on the countdown to the capture of the last major city in Lugansk still held by the Ukrainian forces, Lisichansk. On Sunday, Russian Minister of Defense Shoigu duly reported to President Putin on the fall of Lisichansk and the surrounding territory of more than 150 square kilometers to Russian troops. Even major Western media acknowledged that this was a key event which indicated clearly how Russia was winning the war on the ground thanks to superior firepower.  Everyone understood that the ‘special military operation’ will now direct its full forces against the Ukrainian military in Kramatorsk and other strategic cities in Donetsk oblast with a view to a similar cleansing of that second Donbas region of what the Russians call the neo-Nazi, extreme nationalist fighters . 

However, a more piquant vision of what the future holds was offered on Monday morning’s edition of Sixty Minutes by the commander of the “Akhmat” battalion of special forces Chechen soldiers fighting in the Lugansk region, Apti Alaudinov.  As deputy to the head of the Chechen Republic, Ramzan Kadyrov, Alaudinov has been interviewed on Sixty Minutes every day in past weeks as the battles headed towards their culmination.  This privileged position on Russian airwaves is justified by the major contribution the Chechen battalion has made to the very challenging fight for control of the regional cities.  The artillery battles in the suburbs and fields of Donbas are the job assigned to Russian soldiers, as we see from the interviews conducted on the front lines. These Russians either man the artillery pieces out in the open or sit in consoles of highly sophisticated rocket launchers.  The Chechens are doing the very risky work of urban warfare, flushing out Ukrainian fighters from the basements of residential buildings and civil infrastructure, fighting street by street.

Alaudinov’s remarks on Monday about the way forward will surely be closely studied by Western intelligence operatives in Washington and Brussels for days to come before they percolate up into speeches of EU and US politicians.  He said that following the liberation of all of Lugansk, Russian forces would continue their move South and West, or perhaps might on the way take Kiev.  Then they could turn on the Baltic States, where, in his words, the armed forces of a country like Estonia were negligible. Until ordered to halt by the Commander-in-Chief, they might next take Poland.

Would a direct fight with NATO be intimidating, the program co-host Olga Skabeyeva asked.

With a broad smile on his face, Alaudinov said ‘no,’ the ‘LGBTQ’ led armies of NATO were no match for the forces of the Russian Federation.  “Power to Russia,” he exclaimed in conclusion.

Yes, Russian television can be very entertaining!

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2022

20 thoughts on “Russian television celebrates full ‘liberation’ of the Lugansk oblast (LNR)

  1. Many thanks for that report. Russian TV sounds far more entertaining and informative than what passes for news media in the West.

    Boris Johnson is just an embarrassment, I’m afraid. Perhaps less embarrassing than Joe Biden, but it’s a close run thing. Quite why European leaders have all subordinated their foreign policy to the insane, small clique that runs the USA is a question that still puzzles me.. It surely can’t be bribery or blackmail since that would work far better for South/Central America or Africa, and in those continents, leaders are putting their own populations first. There is some strange groupthink, or collective madness that has infected the G7/EU. Emperor’s new clothes, anyone?

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Western leaders are the comprador class for the US empire and their fate is locked to the fate of the empire. They mostly have used up their intellectual capital to outsmart competitors and reach the position which they now hold, so, mentally exhausted, they just blindly follow the lead of “Uncle Sam.” They also fear that doubting the rationality and usefulness of US politics will end in an eruption of criticism, disapproval, and civil unrest in their own countries.

      Liked by 1 person

    2. I agree. The public discussion from the G7 about pectorals was just embarrassing. What will historians say? What would any reincarnated past leaders say? These guys are self parodies. No need for satire.


  2. Both the Western and Russian media wish to persuade their citizens to support without question a military action on the part of their governments. In each case, there is an appeal to an existential future. However in one case, the appeal is a giant lie to conceal and foster the imperialism of a tiny minority of the population and the increasing fragmentation and imbecility of the majority. Edward Bernays would be proud.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Post-Brexit and in a dire economic situation, one wonders what drives Johnson to stand out “as the most determined advocate for further military and financial assistance to Ukraine and as the most determined opponent of any peace negotiations.” If it is out of loyalty to his masters in Washington, he just may find out that the US does not reciprocate. What is your opinion, Gilbert?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. No, Paul, I think Johnson is not looking to Washington for direction. He is charting his own course in accordance with the “Global Britain” concept that came out of Brexit. His attempt to put together a British led military alliance with Poland, the Baltics and Ukraine is well outside anything Washington may be interested in.

      Liked by 2 people

  4. What is hideous is to hear what Alaudinov says with words that come straight from the Middle Ages and are full of menace and homophobic feelings. I dearly hope somebody in Russia retains enough sense to be horrified. But it seems that Russian media are keen to serve the narrative of the weak West, its decadent values, and it’s fat and debauched leaders, and to juxtapose to that such a fervent macho warrior makes the comparison even more striking.


      1. I hope I did not miss the black humour in your post but I am glad to hear Alaudinov was being humorous. Judging from the other pieces of Russian TV I have seen, it would appear that imagining WWIII is great fun for the audience. Chubby Boris, all those sausage, spaghetti, and frog eaters, all gone in less than a minute!


  5. Your writing is a true delight. I look forward to these and constantly “refresh” the webpage so I am the first to see your new articles.

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.