NewsX World morning news wrap-up, 1 January 2026

My segment in this news wrap-up begins at minute 3.30   Another day has passed and there were more Ukrainian drone attacks which the Russians claim to have shot down.  More questions from the broadcaster on where the war is heading.  Is this going to be a long-term situation of no conclusive victory by either side?  What prevents Europe from recognizing Ukraine’s defeat?

All in the family. A new book for your consideration: ‘Nadine’s Story’

Years ago, Luigi, one of my colleagues at work in the European headquarters of ITT, the world’s biggest ‘conglomerate’ at the time, shared some family wisdom over lunch in his home as we enjoyed the spaghetti that he jokingly claimed was the end result of a thousand years of Italian culinary development. Based on his own marital experience of a failed first marriage, he warned that two artists in a family are one too many. To that I would add today, that one artist in the family is just right for purposes of putting bread on the table and having thought provoking conversation between the partners in a marriage.

In our family, we are both historians.  As you probably know, I received a doctorate in history for which I produced a book that was published as separate articles in scholarly journals at the time. That is to say, I have an academic approach to history and employ the related investigative techniques in my essays, including parsing texts, on global politics today.

My wife, Larisa Vladimirovna Zalesova, is also interested in and writes about the historical past, both recent history and history going back to the start of the 20th century. But she practices a different craft as a novelist. Therein she is the ‘artist’ in our family.

Historical novels are especially attractive to the broad public because they are entertaining. The author enters the minds of the protagonists in a way that academic historians most often cannot do for lack of substantiating documentation, written and otherwise. The limitations of an academic historian in this regard became clear to me in my doctoral research when I entered the archival funds of the Russian legislators and statesmen responsible for the creation of Russia’s first parliament in 1905– and came up with dry dust, not living and breathing persons.

Historical novels like the one I am recommending here, the just published Nadine’s Story. Scenes from Life, draw on the author’s life experience with living and breathing people of today. There is no need to document every sentence with references, which can weigh down the writing of academic historians. And, as a bonus, the novelist can depict ‘scenes from life’ that your academic writer dares not touch such as the erotic and sexually explicit.

Nadine’s Story is a sophisticated piece of adult literature and I will say no more here on that issue.

Two weeks ago, Nadine’s Story was released as a paperback by Amazon into its worldwide distribution network of country websites, amazon.com, amazon.co.uk, amazon.fr, amazon.com.au, amazon.co.jp etc. It is now available through this same global network in ebook format at just under 10 dollars U.S. and the equivalent in local currencies outside the U.S.

Some of these websites already have a ‘look inside’ feature on the book’s web page that allows you to read the first 5 pages online to get a ‘feel’ for the writing style.  Regrettably this ‘look inside’ omits the Foreword which I think is especially useful for potential readers to appreciate the work they are about to acquire.  Accordingly, I reproduce that Foreword here below.

                                                                      *****

                                                                    Foreword

The novel Nadine’s Story was written over thirty years ago and is set in the time period of fifty years ago. In the meantime, almost all of our assumptions about life, about the “free world” and about the USSR have changed dramatically. This necessarily poses several questions which require an answer before the reader undertakes a journey into that world by opening the pages of this novel.

In the Soviet era, it was commonplace for authors to hold their manuscripts in a desk drawer for years before their eventual publication. The reason can be summed up in one word:  censorship. Many widely recognized novels and works of documentary literature from the whole opus of 20th century publications had that fate. Individual works saw print during periods of “thaw,” as for example under the stewardship of Nikita Khrushchev. Many more saw the light of day when the Soviet system of thought control began to crumble under Mikhail Gorbachev and his policy of “Glasnost” in the 1980s.  With the new freedoms which Russians enjoyed when the country closed the door on Communism in the 1990s, still more manuscripts were withdrawn from drawers and found publishers.  One such work, Other People’s Letters by the author Alexander Morozov even won the Russian Booker Prize in 1998, though it stirred up much debate over the practice of publishing works decades after they were written.

In the case of Nadine’s Story, its long resting period till now was due to another kind of ‘censorship’ as practiced in the West: the stranglehold on publishing enjoyed till recently by the established network of publishing houses with their own agendas or ‘programs’ as they call it, interlinked with an established network of literary agents. The match between art and commerce was always fragile. The system had and has limited ability to promote more than a tiny fraction of works of merit outside their own stable of authors.

When Nadine fell victim to the exclusionary policies of publishers in the 1990s, the author moved on to other literary challenges, eventually finding a publisher in 2010 for her second novel, Live as Before (in Russian Живи как прежде) within the St Petersburg literary journal Zvezda, which had long published her articles on cultural affairs in Western Europe.  In 2019, another well-established publisher in the same city, Liki Rossii, produced the Russian-language edition of the author’s next novel, Мозаика моей жизни.  Meanwhile, for the English language edition, The Mosaic of My Life, the author turned to the American specialist company in self-publishing and print-on-demand, Author House.

This last favorable experience, which was reconfirmed with the publication soon afterwards of Zalesova’s first venture into travel literature, Dacha Tales: Life in the Russian Hinterland, persuaded her to dust off and publish Nadine.

As they say, what goes around, comes around. There is a new timeliness to this thirty-year-old manuscript which comes from immigration having become headline news in Western Europe and the USA these past few years. Indeed, the author’s last published novel, The Mosaic of My Life (2020), though covering the broad sweep of Russian history from before the Revolution to the 1970s, in passing had as an issue the question that tormented so many Russians over three generations: whether to remain in their homeland or to leave for better shores at the earliest opportunity come what may. In Nadine, this question is foremost in the mind of the heroine from start to finish.

In the course of the 20th century, Russia lost millions of its citizens not only to political repression and the cruelty of wartime. It also saw repeated exoduses, both officially sanctioned and by stealth.  In the relative stable times under Leonid Brezhnev and his immediate successors, there were several high-profile defections that caught the imagination of the Western world, all the more so as those who fled were among the world’s most gifted artists who changed the perception of ballet the world over for several decades: Rudolf Nureyev, Alexander Baryshnikov, Natalya Makarova. 

Their daring escapes were explained by one motive only:  “I chose freedom.”  What was largely overlooked was that these stars also chose full-blooded careers and artistic development that was denied to them not just because of the constraints of a command economy and authoritarian regime but by the excess of talent around them.  Russia simply had too many of the world’s best talent on hand for the good of its star performers and their time on stage was much less ample than their ambition rightly demanded. With their departure, Russian performing arts obviously lost some of its best calling cards abroad, but did not implode.

In a broader sense, the emigration of countless talented people from Russia to Silicon Valley and to other employment niches in the West did not strip the country of its brains.  The phoenix-like recovery of Russian industry, agriculture and culture in the new millennium attests to the sufficient supply in Russia of world quality masters in a great variety of domains.

The novel Nadine explores the question of staying or leaving from a variety of angles, mostly personal and imbedded in the family life of the heroine. I am confident this story will find its place in the ongoing exploration of emigration worldwide.

Russia-Ukraine War Update: Russia dismisses evidence calls over alleged drone attack| NewsX World

The Ukrainian drone attack on President Putin’s countryside residence near the town of Valdai, midway between Moscow and Petersburg, has been sharply criticized by India, Pakistan and several other Global South countries notwithstanding Zelensky’s claim that no attack took place.

In the USA, there is active discussion of the incident, with many media outlets casting doubt on the Moscow allegations, in line with Zelensky.

Given the long trail of false flag incidents staged by Kiev with the help of the British going back to the first months of the war (the slaughter of civilians in the Ukrainian town of Bucha by retreating Russian soldiers) and the repeated absurd suggestion by Kiev that Russians were attacking nuclear power plants that they themselves were operating or that they smashed dams to drown their own population and deprive them of hydropower electricity, it would be very strange to take seriously the vile propaganda now coming out of Kiev that is being disseminated in the West by the usual suspects.

This was the central issue of this morning’s interview on NewsX World beginning in minute 4.

The relevance of the ‘Two Minutes to Midnight’ Doomsday Clock to the “Ninety five percent agreed” settlement of the Russia-Ukraine War

The media are seeking expert commentary on the statements by Trump and Zelensky in Mar-a-Lago that the terms for a peace treaty are 95% complete.

They are overlooking the folk wisdom of ‘missed by an inch, missed by a mile’, meaning that being close to agreement is never good enough. Either you have a deal or you don’t.   I believe that there is no deal and cannot be a deal when neither Putin nor Zelensky has reason to give ground and seek compromises on the fundamental issues of territory, neutrality status and similar.

The Doomsday Clock of nuclear physicists has been stuck at ‘two minutes to midnight’ since 1953.  The deal on Ukraine may well be stuck at 95% for just as long.

Trump Calls Putin Ahead of Key Meeting: Realistic or Pro-Russia? | WION

In this “Counterpoint” program from India’s largest global English language broadcaster in which I participated this morning, I was pleased to find precisely the debating partner who is so elusive in the podcast world: worldly wise, civilized and holding views on the subject at hand that may be 180 degrees at variance with my own.

The fellow panelist was Joachim Bitterlich. He is described by the WION presenter as a former German ambassador to NATO, but I think it is more relevant to the discussion that he served as European, Diplomatic and Security Advisor to Helmut Kohl in the critically important period of 1988 and later. See his more detailed profile at https://www.bruegel.org/people/joachim-bitterlich

Too bad that the conversation was just getting underway when it ended. It cried for a continuation in some quiet club room, ensconced in leather armchairs and with a whiskey in hand.  There would be no name-calling, no questions like the infamous one I took from Former Chair of the EU Parliament’s Foreign Relations Committee Elmar Brok (German – CDU): “How much did Putin pay you to say that?”

WorldX News interviews: a skillful bearer of information for their global audience

Lavrov Warns Europe: Russia accuses European Union of escalating Ukraine conflict| NewsX World

This brief interview was meant to be in anticipation of Zelensky’s visit to Miami today for talks with Donald Trump.

The full hourly news bulletin from which this interview has been extracted above, may be seen here:

I use this opportunity to note that my virtually daily conversations with the Indian global broadcaster NewsX World are not the only expert opinion of the Russia-Ukraine war that this broadcaster puts on air. Youtube this morning sent me the link to a NewsX World interview with another commentator on the war, this time an Indian professor based in Delhi, who delivered an analysis that is 180 degrees at variance with what I say and was wholly backing the Ukrainians as the peace-seekers versus the warlike Russians who only know how to bomb, bomb and bomb. 

In previous months, at the start of my ‘collaboration’ with NewsX World, they tried to arrange panel discussions but when views of the panelists are so very contradictory, the debate easily turns ugly, as indeed happened.   Hence the separate interviews which do serve their audience well, I believe.

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2025

Russia – Ukraine War  – Ukraine Corruption | World Report | NewsX World

This afternoon’s interview with NewsX World dealt with two topics. First (starting at minute 3.40) was the upcoming visit of Zelensky to Miami for a meeting with Donald Trump and how on the way  Zelensky has stopped off in Canada for talks with Prime Minister Mark Carney. While in Canada, he will hold a virtual conference with his key supporters in Europe to ‘align’ their position on the peace plan that Zelensky is bringing to the States.  The second segment (starting at minute 9.45) dealt with the latest corruption scandals in Kiev, where investigators of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU, in Ukrainian) today descended on the parliament (Verkhovna Rada) to make arrests, said to include two close associates of Zelensky.  News of NABU’s planned visit to the Rada resulted in all but 30 deputies staying away. There also were scuffles outside the Rada building between NABU personnel and security people.  As I say in this interview, NABU, with encouragement from the Trump administration is now circling Zelensky, picking off his associates as a preliminary to ‘nailing’ the President himself.

Regrettably there were technical problems with our communications in the first part of the interview which are not apparent in the video, but they cleared away for the second part.

Kremlin Reviews Ukraine Peace Documents As Putin Sends Trump Christmas Greetings | NewsX World

Short and bitter-sweet, my commentary to India’s NewsX World late in the afternoon today on the present state of peace negotiations and on President Putin’s Christmas greetings to his American counterpart complement the points I raised earlier in discussion with Iran’s Press TV:  these talks are going nowhere because Trump does not enjoy backing in the American political establishment for his present diplomatic efforts with respect to the Russia-Ukraine war.  I come on in minute 3.40 and finish three minutes later.

Nonetheless, viewers may find the Indian broadcaster’s overall hourly news bulletin, of which my interview is a part to be interesting on its own.

Press TV (Iran): Ukraine signals readiness to scale back Eastern forces

In this interview recorded in the morning, we discussed Volodymyr Zelensky’s latest proposal that both sides create buffer zones on their sides of the present battle lines, meaning ‘demilitarization’ of the part of Donetsk still in Ukrainian hands and a similar ‘demilitarization’ of as many kilometers to the east of the battle lines by Russia.

As I remark, this is purely a propaganda initiative by Kiev. They know perfectly well that the proposal is completely unacceptable to the Russians for several reasons that are easy to see.  First, this buffer zone on the Ukrainian side would remain under Ukrainian administration, meaning that the Russian speaking population would remain subject to the brutal repression which touched off their resistance to the newly installed ultra-nationalist government in Kiev in February 2014 and continued for eight years, prompting the Russians to launch their Special Military Operation. 

Zelensky’s ‘demilitarization’ would mean removal of heavy military equipment.  That sounds good, but in fact the war has evolved into a drone war and it is easy to envision that the Ukrainians would continue to launch drones against Russian positions to the East, while Russian responses would be condemned as violation of the peace justifying the entry of European “peacekeepers.”

If we look further afield, the Zelensky proposal does not address the root causes of the war that the Russians insist must be resolved if there is to be a durable peace. This means the neutrality of Ukraine, the ensured absence of any foreign troops or military installations. Though the Russians are not saying this aloud, they seek regime change in Kiev as part of any settlement. The extreme nationalists who have controlled the Kiev government since 2014 must be removed.

For all of the above reasons, the latest Zelensky proposal is dead on arrival in Moscow, even if the Kremlin is saying now politely that they will study it closely.

https://www.urmedium.net/c/presstv/135508

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2025