Conversation with Professor Glenn Diesen, 3 December: US & Russia Sideline Europe & Ukraine in Negotiations

This 30-minute conversation covers very efficiently many of the issues surrounding the negotiations, the issues surrounding the European efforts to sabotage the peace initiative of Donald Trump. Accordingly I can recommend it heartily to the Community.

At the same time, I use this opportunity to say that the deluge of news on and about the war does not let up and the concerns set out in this video have in a way been bypassed by the latest news out of Brussels regarding the European Commission’s dramatic plans to push through the confiscation of Russian state assets to continue funding the war. The Financial Times online this evening sets out in great detail what von der Leyen is planning to do in order to overcome objections from Belgium, the jurisdiction of Euroclear where the single largest amount of these frozen assets are held, and also to overcome possible vetoes to her plans by Hungary and other states. The plan is monstrous and entails the utter destruction of the European Union institutions for one purpose only: to perpetuate the war at all costs.

As I said on the Judging Freedom show earlier today, essentially what is proposed is to prepare a 200 billion euro debt for the Member States without any of the parliaments voting on this vital question and in the knowledge that they will be hit for payment at some future date when the Russians eventually win justice in the courts. At that point, the citizens of Europe will be faced with costs that they never authorized their governments to incur.

Frau von der Leyen is a usurper of power, a dictator on the scale of Hitler. What is surprising, shocking is that the prime ministers of 23 of the 27 European Member States go along with her.  You have to ask where are the men in the room?  Have they all been castrated?  

For those of you who may have wondered how Europe could have blundered into WWI, we now know, because each day we see the present European leaders and the governing elites in Europe displaying utter ignorance of what a Continent-wide war will bring, namely the destruction of what remains of civilization here and the loss of tens of millions of lives.

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2025

Minionzatwork: Why Europe Wants War & Trump Wants Out: Dr. Gilbert Doctorow on the EU’s Fracture

It is always very nice to be invited to address new audiences via new broadcasting partners. Here is the podcast created a day ago in conversation with Immanuel John, the first host in Belgium to engage with me.

It is far reaching, going back in time to explain my involvement in things Russian for decades, including eight years of living and working in Moscow and St Petersburg in the 1990s. It moves on to the current day issues in and around the Russia-Ukraine war.

Enjoy the show!

‘Judging Freedom’ edition of 3 December 2025: Are US/Russian Negotiations a Waste of Time?

‘Judging Freedom’ edition of 3 December 2025: Are US/Russian Negotiations a Waste of Time?

I gladly present this chat with Judge Napolitano because we departed from the strict and often dry terms of foreign policy analysis to other methods which Andrew Napolitano cultivated during his time on the bench but which political scientists, for reasons best known to them, do not deal in:  body language.

We both viewed segments from the most recent public statements by Vladimir Putin, most likely made after the conclusion of his talks with Witkoff and Kushner over peace in Ukraine. My reading of Putin’s body language was that he was supremely confident of the superiority of Russian arms over anything in the European arsenals when he said that Russia is ready to go to war with Europe if that is what they want, and can do so right now. He went on to say that the war will not be very long.

This brought to mind the lyrics of Tom Lehrer’s song to his mother that he would be back from the war in a half hour or so.  For those not clued in:  Putin was saying in veiled language what Russian nationalists have been saying for some time, namely that Russia will not pussy foot with the Europeans in war conditions as it has done with Ukraine because of the residual brotherly feelings towards Ukraine which are absent with regard to Europe. Russia will not fight in the trenches, but will use its tactical nuclear weapons to annihilate any European forces sent against it.

I do hope that in the chancelleries of Europe, and especially in Germany, they have paid close attention to these remarks of Putin, because they make a mockery of the European rearmament efforts at present. No amount of new tanks or artillery, no new fighter jets, no additional recruits to their armed forces, whether volunteer or by a draft, will provide any defense whatsoever for Europe if they go head to head against Russia today.

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2025

Press TV (Iran): Ukraine Peace on the Horizon

I offer this panel discussion on the Spotlight show of Press TV hosted by Marzieh Hashemi which was recorded yesterday and released early in the morning today. My fellow panelist was my good friend Harley Schlanger, based in Potsdam and spokesperson for the International Schiller Institute.  We last were paired by Iran TV in early September.

The discussion was wide ranging and I will not attempt to summarize it here.  You will note that Harley and I are closely aligned on a number of key aspects of the present state of negotiations to end the war, in particular regarding the frantic efforts of the EU to present insurmountable obstacles to peace.

As regards the broadcaster, I note that the quality of the video is superior to what they were producing before the 12 day war with Israel when the Press TV studios were extensively damaged.

https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2025/12/01/759852/UKRAINE-PEACE-ON-THE-HORIZON

Today’s panel discussion of Peskov’s press conference ahead of the state visit to India tomorrow

The production team at NewsX World has been very speedy uploading an interview from a couple of hours ago that I shared with a Delhi-based international relations expert discussing the forthcoming state visit.

While my Indian fellow panelist was aglow with enthusiasm for the state visit and ever closer Russian-Indian relations in a wide array of domains including now atomic energy electricity generating stations (with Rosatom), space exploration and the Arctic North, and while the presenter boasted that the current 68 billion dollars in two-way trade is projected to rise to 100 billion, I was more guarded for a number of reasons. First, the rapid growth in trade has been thanks to an enormous increase in Indian imports of Russian petroleum these past couple of years. This is now stopped dead in its tracks by the Trump secondary tariffs.  For these reasons, the date of this state visit is unfortunate.

US domination of markets continues and puts in jeopardy the economic dimension of BRICS, which is exactly what Trump wants. I acknowledge that directionally, global trade is shifting away from the dollar, but the dramatic effect will be felt only in the long term and in the long term we are all dead.

BRICS and the strategic cooperation between India and Russia are not driving multipolarism; rather it is Russian victory on the battlefields of Ukraine that today is driving multipolarism globally.

Two segments of a morning interview with NewsX World yesterday

Russia Capture Klynove | Macron to visit China | Russia Strikes Dnipro, 3 killed |NewsX World

This piece partly duplicates the material in the separate segment below, but deals additionally with the Russian attack on Dnipro and its logic.  See start from minute 13

Kremlin rejects Megaphone Diplomacy as Putin Prepares Key Meeting with US envoy | NewsX World

This brief interview from yesterday with News X World touches upon several timely issues:  Kaja Kallas saying that this week is pivotal in the peace negotiations, the latest status of plans to use the Russian frozen assets to collateralize a Reparation Loan of 140 billion euros to Ukraine.

Start from 4.14 minute

Putin has been wrong about this war from the beginning

In this essay, I will take on the Putin Hero Worship that is all too common among Russian cheerleaders in Alternative Media. Their misreading of the man and his conduct of the war will multiply 10 times over when a peace is concluded that meets many, though not all of Russia’s objectives.   Yes, we told you so, they will be crowing: peace has come because Putin has made all the right moves and trashed the West.

However, there is a strong argument to make for exactly the opposite interpretation of what has been going on for the nearly four years of this war, namely that it got off to a very bad start and has been drawn out needlessly because of the peculiar strategy that Team Putin put in place and has stuck with notwithstanding mounting fatalities and a worsening international environment that threatens to escalate from the present proxy war against Russia into a Europe wide kinetic war that will devastate the Continent

. If indeed the war ends in the next couple of months, it will be largely due to the efforts of Donald Trump, who is determined to reach a geopolitical settlement with Russia for his own Realpolitik reasons, namely to break up the Russia-China alliance. Regrettably, I agree with Trump that Putin would fight on for years to come in the flawed belief that he is sparing lives by his war of attrition approach and that a total military victory is achievable.  It is not, given the go-for-broke irrational commitment to continuing the war by the EU Member States.

As I have been saying for some time, this war will end and there will likely be Ukrainian capitulation thanks to the political collapse of the Kiev regime, not because the Ukrainian army has been driven from the field of battle. And Kiev is being pushed towards political collapse today by Team Trump more than by anyone else.

                                                                           ****

If we may go back to the very start of the Special Military Operation, I maintain that Team Putin had not done due diligence regarding the likely Ukrainian army response to an invasion and had not fielded an invasion force in the numbers essential for it to succeed.

In my chat with Peter Lavelle on the podcast The Gaggle a couple of weeks ago, Peter reminded me that in the weeks before the start of the Special Military Operation, when I was still a regular guest on the RT show ‘CrossTalk,’ I had been one of the very few analysts in Alternative Media to have predicted the Russian invasion. I do not remember that, but it could well have been so because I am no military expert and would not have seen that the 150,000 troops that the Russians amassed across the Belarus border from Ukraine were only one third the number that normal military doctrine tells you are needed to perform such an operation as crossing into enemy territory to capture the capital and force regime change.

Just a few months into the SMO, I heard from a taxi driver during the hour-long trip from my apartment in an outlying borough of St Petersburg to the city center how Team Putin has stunned his own military intelligence people by not consulting with them before staging the invasion.  And what would a taxi driver know about such things, you may ask.  Well, this driver just happened to be a retired military intelligence officer who remained in touch with his former colleagues and heard the story from them.

Yes, in Russia at various times taxi drivers have been exceptional sources of information. Just remember that Vladimir Putin himself admitted in a public Q&A a year or so ago, that at the start of the 90s he, too, had been a taxi driver for a while just to put bread on the table, given the general economic collapse.

It is fairly obvious that Team Putin expected the Ukrainian military to raise the white flag at the first sign of Russian troops invading, just as they had done in 2014 on Crimea.  One might guess that Putin and his close advisers did not appreciate how effectively British and other NATO trainers had been during the intervening 8 years in reshaping the Ukrainian army. The Russian appeals to the Ukrainian officers to rebel against the extremist nationalist government in Kiev and against the Nazi battalions in their own midst fell on deaf ears.

Indeed, you may go on to ask whether a good people manager like Putin could really ignore the protocol of government administration and not consult with the agency responsible for providing military intelligence.  But this very behavior has in the past two weeks been repeated in a manner for us all to see when Putin completely sidelined Sergei Lavrov and the entire Ministry of Foreign Affairs from the peace negotiations with the USA and Ukraine, relying instead on a relative outsider and neophyte in such matters, Kirill Dmitriev.

Indeed, if the Russian command had poor military and political intelligence on the enemy at the start, it has not become better informed ever since. I point to the ‘surprise’ Ukrainian incursion into the Kursk oblast of the Russian Federation that it took more than six months of fierce fighting to uproot and expel. It is hard to understand why his Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov was not sacked over this disgraceful failure to secure the Russian Federation borders, why no one had checked the fortifications that were supposed to have been built with federal money in Belgorod and Kursk, but never were, or were built with inferior concrete because of local government corruption.

The whole strategy of waging war ‘the Russian way’ brought in by Vladimir Putin  in February 2022, in contrast to the U.S. style ‘shock and awe’ to overwhelm the enemy, has dragged out the war vastly longer than was necessary, has created more killed and severely maimed Russian and Ukrainian soldiers, and has invited Western intervention which all could have been avoided had Putin followed Soviet practice in such matters and used a hammer to crush the fly instead of a napkin.

The lessons of the Soviet invasions of Hungary in 1956 and of Czechoslovakia in 1968 were precisely that massive troop presence must be brought to bear for successful regime change by force of arms. In both cases, the Soviet invasions were cruel, but in the end relatively few people died and the whole exercise was over in a matter of days, at most weeks, not years as is the case today.

These lessons have not been absorbed by Team Putin to this day. For inexplicable reasons the Boss in the Kremlin refuses to make a decapitating strike in Kiev to end the fighting at once without further loss of life.

As I say above, it is the intervention of Donald Trump that is bringing down the Kiev regime. The United States stands behind the anti-corruption investigations that already have greatly weakened Zelensky’s position following the forced resignation of his head of the Presidential Administration and power behind the throne, Andrii Yermak.  It is Team Trump who have been sidelining Europe, letting the air out of the balloon of the Coalition of the Willing, and preparing the way for capitulation by Kiev before anyone in Brussels can raise a finger.

Don’t get me wrong. I have the greatest respect for Vladimir Putin as the man who put Russia back on its feet economically, socially and in military might after the collapse and disgrace of the 1990s. For these achievements, he may be honored for decades to come with monuments all around the Federation. But as we say in the business world: ‘horses for courses.’  And Putin, the nation builder in peacetime has been making too many wrong moves as Commander in Chief of a nation at war.

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2025

Kazakhstan Ukraine Tension: Ukraine Drone Attack on CPC Terminal Has Created Spark | NewsX World, 30 November

I consider my most important discussion point in this interview the observation that the attack on Russia’s Novorossiisk oil terminal which has shut down 80% of Kazakhstan’s oil exports was by one or more Ukrainian naval drones. It is reasonable to believe that the British have enabled this attack which punishes not Russia but the American companies that own the wells and partly own the pipeline transporting the oil to the now damaged port terminal on the Black Sea. Let us remember that it is precisely the British who were behind the naval drone attack on the Kerch bridge connecting Crimea to mainland Russia more than a year ago and also behind drone attacks on Russian naval vessels based in Sevastopol. It would be useful if this question of British dirty work were put to Prime Minister Starmer for clarifications.

Russia Ukraine Peace Deal: Ukraine prepares high-level talks with United States | NewsX World

This video interview on the Indian broadcaster yesterday morning starts at minute 15 and ends at minute 21. It deals with three issues: the significance of Andrii Yermak’s forced resignation for what the US-Ukraine negotiations in Washington will look like at the start of the coming week; the ‘humanitarian’ concerns which Trump say drive his intervention to end the war; and the Realpolitik explanation for his priority on luring Russia away from its close alliance with China.