U.S. Nailed to the Wall on Illicit Biological Weapons Labs in Ukraine

A couple of days ago, when I presented a summary of the dramatic information and warnings conveyed in the latest televised briefing by the spokesman for the Russian military, Igor Konoshenkov, I received back from some readers the comment that this was all just Russian propaganda, similar to the kind of propaganda we hear regularly coming from the Pentagon and State Department. The allegations of biological weapons banned under international convention being produced in experimental laboratories in Kharkiv and other Ukrainian towns under programs paid for and supervised by Americans had to be fake news, these skeptics and cynics maintained. The same had to be true of Konoshenkov’s asserting that the Ukrainians were working on dirty nuclear bombs at their Zaporozhye nuclear power stations, which had just been captured by Russian forces.

Nonetheless, yesterday the story about biological weapons labs received convincing confirmation from the U.S. State Department, when Victoria Nuland, Under Secretary for Political Affairs, said publicly before microphones that the USA fears that its biological labs in Ukraine will “fall into the wrong hands.”  That is a very convoluted admission that the Russians’ allegations are perfectly true. The U.S. is battening down the hatches against the coming storm of international indignation, at the same time trying to divert attention away from itself by suggesting that the Russians might do something dastardly with what they find.

American evasion and attempted dissimulation were stymied however when, also yesterday, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs demanded an explanation from the United States of what exactly Americans have been doing not only in their Ukrainian labs, which were situated in cities across the Ukraine from Kharkiv to Lviv, but in a total of 336 such labs spread out across the world.  Intense Chinese concern is understandable since one such laboratory was in Wuhan, the point of origin of Covid19.

Still on the subject of biological weapons being prepared in Ukraine under United States funding and guidance, Russian experts were on television this morning explaining how leaks from these labs have been monitored over the past few years. In one such case, 450 Ukrainian civilians were said to have died from biological agents that contaminated their residential block. This number, you will note, is higher than the total number of civilian deaths in the ongoing “barbaric” Russian operation in Ukraine as reported in The Financial times (characterization as “barbaric” by Andrew Bacevich, Chairman of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, a self-described American think tank for peace). The Russians are now examining whether outbreaks of swine flu and avian flu that caused havoc with their livestock in farming areas close to the Ukrainian border may not have been artificially induced by saboteurs coming from Ukraine. Work on viruses transmissible from animals to humans was also reportedly being done in the Ukrainian facilities.

Let us now turn to the question of Ukraine’s program to produce nuclear weapons, which Konoshenkov also mentioned in his briefing.  Today Russian news is saying that they possess more than just documentary proof of such development, which contravenes the Budapest Memorandum of 1994 and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, to which Ukraine is a signatory. The Russians now claim to have found sample “baby bombs” which will prove beyond doubt the nuclear ambitions of Kiev for which the United States was a guiding force.

All of the foregoing points to what may be expected when the Russians finish their demilitarization and denazification campaign in Ukraine in the next several weeks.  They may well convene an international tribunal to try the Ukrainians who were responsible for the illicit programs involving weapons of mass destruction. We may expect the Chinese to join them in running the tribunal, as well as other closely interested countries.  It is also reasonable to expect that this tribunal will identify and seek to extradite their American handlers.  This may be difficult, because Moscow has already said today that the Americans on the ground in Ukraine overseeing the biological weapons laboratories all carried diplomatic passports.  However, the Russians, like the Americans, can be very resourceful in cases like this.


Finally, before closing today’s bulletin of latest developments in the Russia-Ukraine war at the political level, I direct attention to the question of Poland’s turning over its fleet of Soviet-era MIG jet fighters to Ukraine, which has been a hot issue on Western news these past few days.  The Poles had been in discussions over this possibility with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken last week, and Blinken seemed to be approving.  For the Poles, the proposed “donation” to support Ukraine would be a godsend.  They would get rid their fleet of old Soviet planes and would receive in exchange from the United States F-16 fighters, thereby better integrating Poland into the standard equipment of NATO fully at the charge of Uncle Sam. Let us assume the transaction would come to half a billion to one billion dollars to the benefit of Warsaw and to the cost of U.S. taxpayers.

Is it any wonder that several other former Warsaw Pact countries, now NATO member states yesterday said they too were ready to help the comrades in Ukraine by turning their old MIGs over to Kiev and taking in exchange United States fighter planes.

Warsaw announced yesterday that it intended to fly its MIGs to the Ramstein air base in southwestern Germany for the hand-over. This news release apparently took the U.S Government by surprise.  At her testimony before the Senate a little later in the day, Victoria Nuland said she had no pre-warning of the announcement and would not comment till she got back to her office and studied the matter further.

This announcement was indeed remarkable.  Ramstein is the headquarters of the United States Air Forces in Europe and also of the NATO Allied Air Command.  If the MIGs had simply been transferred to Ukrainian pilots on Polish territory and then flown into combat in Ukraine, then they would bring down on the dispatching airport in Poland the instant retribution that General Konoshenkov stated explicitly two days ago.  By sending the planes to Ramstein for the hand-over to the Ukrainians, the Russian response, cruise or hypersonic missile attack, would go instead against the United States air base. 

Dear promoters of Poland as the defense shield of Europe in Washington:  pay close attention to what your friends would do to you.

However, none of this will come to pass, as we may conclude by today’s announcement from the Pentagon that the deal is unacceptable and is outside the competence of Poland to offer.  Today the Pentagon spokesmen say plainly that the issue at hand concerns all of NATO and can be taken only by NATO collectively, not by one member, Poland.

This is a nice formally correct explanation from the Pentagon.  The subtext is that the U.S. Chiefs of Staff have taken with the utmost seriousness the warnings of retaliation from Konoshenkov,  against NATO, Article 5 or no Article 5 pledges of ‘one for all and all for one.’  Meanwhile, the general public in the United States is clueless because virtually nothing about this appeared in major media.


When the war started, President Putin was hopeful to come to a quick understanding with the leading officers of the Ukrainian armed forces regarding capitulation and regime change.  However, in a matter of days it became clear that the Ukrainian military has been thoroughly infiltrated by radical nationalists and is unable to act in the interests of the nation independently. It now appears that this type of analysis would be better applied to the United States of America.  Only the senior generals in the Pentagon have their eyes and ears wide open to the Russian capabilities and intentions.  The political classes, both Democrats and Republicans on The Hill, are lost in their own virtual world of unlimited United States power. That alone explains the potentially suicidal demand from Democrats yesterday that Biden now impose a ‘no-fly zone’ over Ukraine.

It may be that the war will end when the Pentagon generals and their Russian counterparts sit down and talk about revising the European architecture of security, leaving Blinken and his associates to look on through the windows.

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2022

12 thoughts on “U.S. Nailed to the Wall on Illicit Biological Weapons Labs in Ukraine

  1. As a former Polish resident, I have to say this was a Polish master stroke, calling the US bluff.

    Perhaps they are slowly learning that the US is always a false friend.
    Neither Germany nor US dare allow Ukrainian pilots to fly out of Rammstein.
    The plan to fight to the last Ukrainian was going to be expanded to the last Pole. But no Americans or Germans.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. “… This number, you will note, is higher than the total number of civilian deaths in the ongoing “barbaric” Russian in Ukraine as reported in The Financial times (characterization as “barbaric” by Andrew Bacevich, Chairman of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft…”
    The Quincy Institute is the latest forum for Colonel Andrew Bacevich-Ret whose work I have followed and frequently-enough disagreed with over the years. I’ve always kept my disagreements especially polite for the memory of his son, KIA in Iraq as a combat officer. But I find Col Bacevich increasingly hardlining as the years go by, and not only that, his current perch at Quincy is no doubt well compensated as its strange bedfellow funders are no other than the never known for innocent and unconditional altruism Charles Koch and George Soros. There are reasons incest is to be avoided, even if and especially when it comes to the actual motives of families tied by vast fortunes and always questionable intentions.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Excellent coverage (as always), much appreciated. And as Glenn Greenwald wisely quipped regarding Nuland’s quasi-admission,
    “Why is she so concerned Russia would seize such a benign ‘biological research facility’?”

    Liked by 1 person

  4. The laboratory in Wuhan has NOT been proven to be the origin of COVID. The origin has yet to be determined. The unproven and likely false assertions of the Wuhan lab leak precisest even here while the research on COVID is ongoing and inconclusive at this time.


  5. Russia insists it has no plans for regime change in Ukraine, but how can they accomplish a ‘de-naziification’ without drawing in key members of the present government? The claim strikes me as disingenuous on Russia’s part (and I am sympathetic to their aims) To rid Ukraine of its ultra-nationalist factions will surely entail regime change (most assuredly in Zelensky’s case).


  6. “The U.S. is battening down the hatches against the coming storm of international indignation,” – but that is just the problem that Russia faces! There WILL BE NO INTERNATIONAL INDIGNATION”. The world press is in the American´s pockets. I noticed today on BBC that they have a new propaganda narrative accusing the Russians of “planning” to use chemical weapons! while NOTHING was even mentioned about Neuland´s admission! about the labs!!! Russia had better find some kind of deal to make and find it soon before it is completely isolated from the whole world. Unfortunately, Putin has clearly misjudged this campaign even though he was practically forced into it.


  7. “ It may be that the war will end when the Pentagon generals and their Russian counterparts sit down and talk about revising the European architecture of security, leaving Blinken and his associates to look on through the windows.”

    Would this qualify as regime change in Washington? Cruel to let us get our hopes up like that.


Comments are closed.